Webology, Volume 1, Number 1, August, 2004 |
Home | Table of Contents | Titles & Subject Index | Authors Index |
Dariush Alimohammadi
MLIS, Reference Librarian, Majlis Research Center, Islamic Consultative Assembly, 96 Vesal Shirazi Ave., P.O.Box 11345-1734, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: webliographer (at) gmail.com
Received May 15, 2004; Accepted July 1, 2004
This paper explains web-based information retrieval as one of the main research interests of information professionals during the last decade, and introduces machine-oriented and human-oriented approaches in the designing process of Internet search tools and concerns with the second approach as a basis for the discussion. Then it defines the concept of webliography as a special type human-edited search tools. It is in fact an enumerative list of hypertext links and a gateway to the scientific sources of information on the Net, whether annotated or not. The existence and development of webliographies on the Net are justified based on a brief literature review. 14 phases of webliography production process are also enumerated step by step and a conclusion is provided finally.
Webliography, Designing, World Wide Web, Web Information retrieval, Internet
Information Retrieval (IR) on the World Wide Web has become a terrible and tedious experience for almost all of the end-users (novices/professionals) during the past decade. This statement has been supported by findings of several overlapping research studies in computer sciences, library and information sciences and mass media. This common research area is in fact the domain of online IR literature. The aim of the researches in this domain is exploring structure, specifications, and functions of online information systems and causes of the problem of information retrieval, to explain outcomes of this new and emerging situation, and to propose some linguistically-based and IT-oriented methods to solve the problem and to increase recall and precision in the process of information retrieval.
Looking at the recent IR literature shows that most of the research studies have been based on the application of automated mechanisms, i.e. development of the Internet search engines. In other words, solutions have been mainly focused on machine-oriented approach. But information retrieval from the Internet is still problematic.
Therefore, regarding the unsatisfactory progress of the automated IR on the Internet, information professionals have had a mere glance at the human-oriented approach as another way to improve online IR. They have concerned with non-automated and semi-automated mechanisms, i.e. development of web directories as additional solutions. They have designed, developed and tested some manual techniques/search tools, such as webliographies.
This paper discusses the development of the webliography as an Internet search tool. The discussion is based on the findings of some group theoretical studies and practical exercises at the Allame Tabataba'ee University (A.T.U.) (Alimohammadi, 2004b).
A Webliography, according to the accepted definition, is an enumerative list of hypertext links and a gateway to the scientific sources of information on the Net, whether annotated or not (Alimohammadi, 2004a; Portland Community College, 2004; Potts, 2004; Smith, 2004). An example is A Poe Webliography (http://newark.rutgers.edu/~ehrlich/poesites.html). It is a critical guide to electronic resources for Poe research on the World Wide Web and CD-ROM, including electronic texts, HTML-encoded texts, hypertexts, secondary works, commentaries, and indexes. Webliographies are in fact digital equivalents of bibliographies (printed lists of information sources). Bibliographies are secondary sources among print media and Webliographies are the same on the Net.
Why do we concern with webliographies? In other words, is the development of webliographies reasonable or justifiable in an age of intelligent retrieval systems?
A brief review of the past studies on Webliographies can provide us with a clearer picture of the state of the art and importance of Webliographies. Searching the databases of library and information science and related fields shows that the amount of literature about webliographies is not considerable and more studies need to be done. Most of the published articles on webliographies are in fact printed forms of manipulated webliographies in a wide range of various topics. In other words, their authors have tried to identify, evaluate, select, gather, organize and publish lists of accredited web sites on the context of specialized journals.
The first theoretical text on webliographies was written by S.R. Harris (1997). He argued that librarians must take an active role in providing subject access to information on the Internet, discussed those aspects of bibliography that are relevant to online information resources, and proposed webliography as an important responsibility for librarians. In addition, he stressed that librarians should not only create useful products for the user, but should also develop knowledge of the particular online literature. This available literature can be useful in providing reference and instructional services to their constituencies.
Marino (1998) discussed the use of webliographies as collections of Internet sites on a particular subject, to help students find relevant and useful sources on the World Wide Web. Also, she highlighted the validity of information sources; developing criteria for evaluating information; how to set up a webliography web page; and HTML commands.
To the best of the author's knowledge, so far just one survey has been done on webliographies. Alimohammadi (2004a) in a survey found out that webliographies are becoming more popular among Internet publishers and end-users. In his research, totally, 696 webliographies were reviewed. The research discovered that 84/9 % of webliographies have been updated during their second time period of life.
Alimohammadi (2004b) in another article reported an experience at the Allame Tabataba'ee University. The report concerned initially with an exploration of the current situation of online information retrieval on the World Wide Web and continued with an introduction to the Internet search tools and webliographies specifically. After an explanation of the experience, a sample of designed webliographies illustrated. Alimohammadi concluded that this experience should be adopted by other LIS Departments all over the country (Iran as context of the experience).
However, looking at the aforementioned items shows maturity of webliography literature. Harris & Marino discussed advantages of webliographies as gateways that provide subject access on the World Wide Web. They also stressed that designing webliographies is one of the librarians' responsibilities. Marino provided some notes about technical aspects of the designing of webliographies specifically. Since the publication of Harris's and Marino's articles many webliographies have been designed and become available online. Alimohammadi wanted to answer an important question, an answer that could be applied in planning some of the future information policies and projects. Based on the results he gained, an instructional course was developed at the Allame Tabataba'ee University. Surprising outcomes were achieved at the end of the course and taking the outcomes into account was proposed. Regarding to the literature review and the A.T.U.'s experience, we shall explain 14 phases which should be followed to design a webliography.
To develop a webliography, these phases should be followed step by step:
As it was discussed, the literature of webliography is gradually becoming matured and we are entering to an era of designing webliographies more and more. This means that some research projects should be done on topics such as designing a semantic network among webliographies (using subject headings, classification schemes, thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies) and organizing them to produce a directory of webliographies (meta-webliography) based on their subject categories and semantic relations. For designing a meta-webliography, the same procedure can be followed.
Learning/reinforcing some other skills such as searching, evaluating and composing the Internet resources is also possible during the process. These techniques could also be utilized in many other contexts such as building/developing online collections for information centers, deploying an effective and new logic for organizing the digital sources of information, providing reference/information services on the Net, designing library and information centers' web sites, and teaching information seeking skills to the end-users.
The designer/maintainer is responsible for accuracy and currency of the webliography. This means that s/he has to browse the content of the webliography in due course and modify outdated information/hyperlinks. Of course, some intelligent software has been designed during the past years. These softwares check hyperlinks automatically and alarm when they face to a blind link. But they cannot compare the annotation with the content of the web site. In order to solve this problem, the designer has to browse included web sites and update related annotations according to the new uploaded version of given web sites.
I should acknowledge Miss. Mahshid Sajjadi who studied the earlier draft of the paper and pointed out some valuable notes.